Sheryl St. Germain's Interview by
Dixon Hearne
Thank you, Sheryl, for agreeing to this interview
with Delta Poetry Review. I know it is impossible to touch upon
every salient point in an interview, but I know our readers will be
very interested in your keen insights, observations, and experiences
as a poet and writer.
DPR: Eudora Welty once
said that one place understood helps us to understand all places
better. You are a native Louisianan. How do you think cultural
influences from the south play a role in your writing? How does that
differ from regional influences in other parts of the country? What
is particular or unique about the southern experience as it relates
to writing—whether narrative or poetic work?
SSG: For some of us, place is perhaps the primary
shaper of voice. As a writer from the New Orleans area, I come from
a place surrounded with water: Lake Pontchartrain was three blocks
from our childhood home in Kenner, and the Mississippi just a couple
miles the other direction. Ditches that ran alongside our homes
provided incredible possibilities for discoveries as a
child—crawfish and snakes for us—and hurricanes and subsequent
evacuations also gave shape to my voice and personality. Early poems
of mine, such as “The Lake” and “Going Home” offer great examples of
how both culture and nature were in my blood from the beginning. I
love drama and color; the focus on sensory perceptions in both my
writing and in the fiber art that I also work with surely comes from
growing up in New Orleans. Food and drink play a large part in my
early poems, an aspect of place that sometimes gets overlooked. I’ve
written poems and essays inspired by gumbo, red beans and rice, and
bread pudding, for example. Much of my work has also been influenced
by the ebb and flow of water and flood, both as a theme and formal
inspiration.
It’s tempting to flatten
out cultural experience, to say most people from any given place
will respond to it similarly, but that couldn’t be farther from the
truth. In my case, I have a love-hate relationship with the South
because of the many tragedies that befell my family there, mostly
related to substance abuse. I moved away from New Orleans when I was
almost 30 for graduate school but never returned to live because
there was a part of me that feared falling into the swamp of
addiction and alcoholism that took so many in my family. There was a
kind of excess in my family that centered on eating, drinking, and
sometimes violence that frightened me, much as I loved so much about
the city, Mardi Gras and gumbo, swamps and bayous, the music and
diversity. I’ve written about this ambivalence in several of my
essays, and I think it also comes out in some of my poems.
New Orleans has a
specific character—one might say it is a place of strong
personality—unlike that of, say, Lafayette, where I also lived for a
time, or Slidell, which I have only driven through. I think the
regional differences that make my voice what it is are what’s most
important. That might not be the case with someone who grew up in
Iowa, for example, where I also spent many years.
DPR: What is your most recent book
publication? Tell us about this collection. It’s such an evocative
title. Where did it come from? Does each of your published books
influence the content or poetic style of subsequent poetry
collections?
SSG: My most recent publication, out this year, is
a hybrid collection of lyric essays and poems called Fifty Miles
(Etruscan Press). It followed a collection of poems, The Small
Door of Your Death (Autumn House Press) that was published in
2018. I see the two as companions in that they both explore the
death of my son Gray in 2014 of a heroin overdose. Most of the poems
in The Small Door were written either before or very soon
after my son’s death. At that time, I was struggling to find a
narrative that would help me articulate and maybe even understand
his death, so these poems are pure lyric, short and sharp as a shard
of glass. They investigate a mother’s grief and present, I hope, a
compassionate but unsentimental portrayal of a son, his mother, and
their tragic journey. The title of the collection refers, literally
to the needle mark the detectives found in my son’s wrist when they
discovered him, that mark a small hole, the opening that allowed the
heroin into his veins, which led to his death. But I also hoped the
title would be understood metaphorically. The way to the kind of
death my son experienced was through a narrowing of his life and his
curiosity about the world. As he became more and more tied to
drugs—and there were many, not just heroin—his world shrunk until
there was finally just one door left that led, ultimately, to his
death.
Fifty Miles
contains some poems that I didn’t think would fit in A Small Door,
and they are sprinkled between longer essays that explore cultural
issues that might have contributed to my son’s ultimate choices,
including his being diagnosed with ADHD at 5 and being prescribed
Ritalin and Adderall, which were the first drugs he ultimately
abused. There’s also a very long essay about playing video games
with him; I wanted to tell a story that didn’t demonize video games
but showed how that playing connected us. These are just two
examples of pieces whose narrative imperatives would not have worked
well in poems.
I have been alternating
publishing poetry and poems in the last twenty years. It seems
almost as if once the poetry book comes out, I realize there is so
much more I could have said, and the essayistic impulse takes over.
And once that book is out, I long for the pure lyricism of the poem
again. I feel blessed to be able to work in both genres.
DPR: How important do you think it is to
experiment with form, or to at least have background knowledge of
the way certain forms of poetry work?
SSG: I think it’s very important for poets to
understand form before they begin to experiment with it. In my last
years of teaching, I began to teach the prose poem before teaching
sonnets or villanelles or even traditionally lined poetry because I
wanted to make sure students understood the power of the sentence
before they began to break it up into lines. I found that strategy
worked well, and after having worked with the prose poem, they were
then able to write lined poems whose line breaks were more
intentional, and about which they could talk. After that, we began
to work with some traditional forms. If you don’t know how to write
a sonnet, you won’t understand how to write a broken sonnet or know
how to play, or riff off that form.
DPR: We all deal with love and loss at
various points in our lives. You write eloquently about the loss of
your young son. It is often asserted that writing is therapeutic.
How has writing helped you confront and deal with your personal
loss? Do you recommend it as an intervention, i.e., more than just
simple exercises?
SSG: Writing has often helped me work through tragedy. I have kept
journals all my life, and the ability to shape something into a
paragraph or a poem allowed me to have the (more often than not
false) sense that I had some control over a situation. The poem or
paragraph captured the experience, contained chaos if you will.
Writing can be therapeutic, and it can contribute to healing, but it
cannot substitute for therapy. I have had a therapist for over
twenty years, and that relationship has counted more in terms of
substantive healing than my writing has. Writing—especially poetry
writing—helps me to lay things out in all their complexity. Here is
the thing in all its horror and ambiguity, and maybe there is a
small insight that comes out of that. It helps me to imagine other
sides of a story, imagine what might have been, honor grief and
darkness. I think tragedy drives many artists, not just poets, to
work. While they are working, they are alive.
It must be said that the
reading of other’s works can sometimes be as healing as one’s own
writing. I have taught creative writing for many years in jails and
rehabilitation facilities where we begin by reading the works of
others. To read a poem or story that articulates a courageous vision
about some tragedy can be incredibly inspiring for the reader.
Especially powerful are those works that present tragedy without
moralizing or compromising a vision.
DPR: Your latest book, Fifty Miles
Etruscan Press, 2020), is a mix of poetry and essays. Might you
share a bit about the book, particularly its purpose and message?
SSG: The book traces my own journey and healing
from substance abuse as well as my son’s journey to death. The
title, Fifty Miles, represents two literal and metaphorical
journeys my son and I took separately. When I was in my twenties,
living in Hammond, Louisiana and attending Southeastern Louisiana
University, I spent some months shooting up cocaine with a lover. At
some point, I came to my senses (it’s actually much more complicated
than that, but read the book to find out!) and drove fifty miles to
Baton Rouge to stay with a friend who helped me recover. I took a
bus to Hammond two days a week for classes until I graduated. Over
thirty years later, my son would wake up one deeply foggy morning in
Dallas, Texas, where he lived and had been in recovery, to drive to
a small town fifty miles away, where he bought some heroin from a
friend and overdosed. Many of the essays in the book, including the
titular one, are lyric meditations on these two journeys.
Overall, though, I would
say this is a book about hope. Many of the pieces are about the ways
I stayed sane, or tried to, while Gray was creating and living in
ever troubling worlds, and how I worked with grief after he died,
specifically through traditional arts such as crochet, and through
traveling, gaming, teaching, and writing.
DPR: What guiding principles inform and
guide your poetry and essay writing? What themes and topics
(psychological, philosophical, emotional) appear most often in your
writing? What literary devices and/or approaches do you favor, if
any?
SSG: I am a great fan of metaphor and reflection in
both poetry and the essay. I love prose poetry as well as the lyric
essay, which I think of as being like a poem in old clothes. Prose
lyricism might be something I’d say that I love to work with. I also
love the work of poet Pablo Neruda and have always been inspired by
his Odas Elementales, a collection of odes to humble things
like socks, lemons, tomatoes, etc. I aim for the elemental in my own
work. I aim to work as a translator might—to allow something to move
through me to the page. I don’t want the reader distracted by
thinking about the writing but rather to come out of a poem or essay
moved and thinking in new ways.
I also love what Franz
Kafka is said to have written about good literature, that we should
read only the kinds of books “that wound or stab us.” A book, he
wrote, “must be the axe for the frozen sea within us.” I hope that
my work feels like that axe.
|
Sheryl
St. Germain’s The Small Door of Your Death is a memory poem for
Gray St. Germain Gideon, her son. The composition is a
confoundingly disarming poem and a powerful triggering work. I hear in
it echoes of two of the most elegant recent poetic-philosophic works on
loss and grief, Brenda Hillman’s Death Tractates and Edward
Hirsch’s I hear the moaning of Niobe. I see in it the work
of the textile artist who makes grief quilts, personal grief quilts for
those close by and I see in it the work of world-wide/culture-wide grief
quilters like those whose quilts gave us the AIDs Quilt Project
addressing still undocumented loss not unlike the alcoholism epidemic
losses that have long plagued our country and families and the opioid
and drug epidemic that took her son Gray from her.
I see in The Small Door of Your Death a
flip in the disquisitions of Hamlet, this time a mother enthralled and
entrapped in the tragic loss of a son. I hear in it what Dmitri
Shostakovich scores in his 7th Symphony, what Anna Akhmatova must have
felt during those dire days in Leningrad aching for the loss of her
imprisoned son, her city, and her country. What St. Germain has come to
in response to her grief is the creation of a symphonic tone poem,
informed as much by music as by her gifts as a teacher, a Words Without
Walls social worker, and a poet.
This book reads as much as one long poem as it
does as a collection of titled shorter poems. And, it has all the
hallmarks of the kinds of longer musical works St. Germain is so
familiar with and which she has long allowed to influence her work in
poetry.
The first poem in the collection, “Loving an
Addict,” announces the traditional A and B themes of quartets,
concertos, suites, symphonies:
“it was always fights or lies
maybe at the end
I preferred the lies
Much of Part 1 is exposition: the past, the
heritage, the setup, and the ties to addiction that mother and son have
as part of the families they grew up in, as part who they are. Part 1
also introduces one of the major variations on a theme in the work, the
motif of divination and the Suit of Swords from the Tarot cards. The
Swords in the Tarot are consciousness guides, intellect guides, seeing
and understanding guides.
The Swords motif is used 5 times in part 1, and 5
times in part 2 which begins and ends with the poem “Rehab”:
we’re here, our skin thin as parchment
…
It’s hard to hope, but we cling
to any worm of it
the lights
in the rooms here, after all, are so bright
The motif will not appear again until Part 5 and
only once. In this latter play on the motive, the poem invokes Einstein:
“ We should take care not to make the intellect our god,” and shifts to
a woman lying on the stone floor of a church trying to conjure a god she
can believe in. What we are left with at the end is the unending
restlessness of the journey into understanding, knowledge, clarity,
transparency:
… all she feels is the edge
of her spine, resting for now,
as much as swords can rest
The resting or lack of it, will be absorbed into
the fabric of the larger composition, absorbed as much as it can be
absorbed but still felt to the very last poem in the collection.
Part 2 of The Small Door of Your Death
contains the poem “[it comes down to this],” a prefiguring of the
musical suite that will become Part 3 of the book. In this poem (also a
four part mini-suite very near the center of this memory poem) we get
the title of the collection and a shift in the way memory will work as
the themes are further developed:
you chose the vein
in the back of a hand
to carry
this last intimacy
a puncture mark
the small door
of your death
“Benediction, a Suite” a prose poem section of
the work comprises the whole of Part 3 and it is a sort of musical hinge
holding the diptych created by Parts 1 & 2 and Parts 3 & 4.
“Benediction, a Suite” is skein, cord, knit, crochet, weave, all on
Gray’s name: “A name for one we hoped would follow his own path, wild as
wolf or heron or whale, though we knew, too, that gray’s the color of
mourning, ambiguity. … I grieve by stitching a blanket of the most
sumptuous yarns, each a slightly different shade of gray …. … With each
round my hands remember your sadness and wildness, with each row a wish
I could have stitched your wounds…. … too late, these words of slate and
silver … grays dark as storm clouds … bone light as your ashes.
Part 4 is largely the music of confrontation and
lamentation. It begins with the “Viewing the Body” and with the
revelation of “Never again this body, never this vessel through which I
knew you.” It is the beginning of both loosening and realizations,
rituals of loss and departure: “The Drop” where the father murmurs
something like this being the “last Gray switch” in a meeting
where the son’s ashes are halved between divorced parents. The section
is further developed with poems on meeting the drug pusher, the
disposition of ashes, returning memories, and a tribute to Gray’s work
as a musician and to all the things good and otherwise that brought him
to his last work in the world.
The closing poem of Part 4, “Less a Song Than a
Compilation of Beats,” uses the title of one of Gray’s own musical
compositions, and the section ends without judgment, with a nod to the
very art that sustained him for as long as it could, and with the
suggestion that every song, and every poem, is a compilation of beats
and that few of them, if any, are ever finished. The poem itself I read
it is an anguished reconciliation leading to, not the final stages of
grief, but to another stage where the breathing is slightly different
and the count is somewhat, and only somewhat, more bearable:
we sewed you together during the day
you unraveled by dusk
frenzied and free,
each night you worked that song
you’d never finish
Movement 5, or Part 5, is a movement through the
grief. The poems become more and more the music of memory: Gray
remembered in Amsterdam, among the windmills, in France; Gray embedded
in reasons to live in red cowboy boots, in his mother’s favorite color,
in the first color she sang; and Gray woven into in the yearning tulips
at Keukenhof. If grief cannot be transformed, it drifts -- in poem, in
music, in nature:
Here in these fields, grief drifts,
alongside waves of tulips,
radiant, yearning.
The book ends with a coda of sorts, “Prayer for a
Son,” a poem filled with lyric beauty, with death absorbed into life
into death into life, filled with the prayerful silence that memory
sometimes brings us to. The ending is personal, intimate, sacred. Here
there are finally the last vestiges of song and the final compilation of
beats:
… may we be blessed to hear you
In song of bird and cricket
And then the final notes:
… and in the silence after
the poem’s last word.
The Small Door of Your Death
is so much
more than we come to expect from a book of poems. It is tractate,
disquisition, song, symphony. It is consolation and philosophy. It is
grief materialized right before our eyes, personal grief and grief that
grips communities and nations. It is ache. Loss. History. Dream. It is
also Hope and Solace, and how memory stands with us at our most
destitute times, how love finally, and love only, saves us.
|