~ Delta Poetry Review ~ |
||||
- Interview and Book Review - |
||||
Jeffrey Alfier Interview by Dixon Hearne |
||||
Thank you for your time and valuable insights. I know you’re a busy person. We are so pleased to talk to you about your inspiring poetics, and we know our readers will enjoy what you have to share with us. DPR: When and where did poetics take root in your creative life? Were you immediately consumed with desire?
JA: In the early ‘90s I began writing a few drunken lines when I was in the Air Force on temporary duty to Greece. But poetry didn’t seriously take root until 1997 when I came across some serious verse — the British trench poets of World War One. Never had I known language could render images so stark and stunningly. That’s when that desire took firm hold when my endless love affair with language began. But it took about five years for me to write anything decent and to be accepted in credible literary publications.
DPR: How important do you think it is to experiment with form, or to at least have background knowledge of the way certain forms of poetry work?
JA: Not very important for me, though for years I wrote in syllabics alone until abandoning that form in favor of solely honing images — ones worthy and durable.
DPR: What kind of poetry or aesthetics appeals to you? Any specific example?
JA: It is mostly concision — economy of language that produces keen and hopefully memorable images. For the poet, every definite and indefinite article, every preposition, conjunctions, and every line ending, is of vital importance. And wed to that inextricably is what Keats called negative capability, especially in the last line of the poem. Here’s an example of such negative capability, Bruce Weigl’s poem,
“Temple Near Quang Tri,
Not On the Map”
Dusk, the ivy thick with sparrows
squawking for more room
is all we hear; we see
birds move on the walls of the temple
shaping their calligraphy of wings.
Ivy is thick in the grottoes,
on the moon-watching platform and ivy keeps the door from fully closing.
The point man leads us and we are
inside, lifting
the white washbowl, the smaller bowl
for rice, the stone lanterns
and carved stone heads that open
above the carved faces for incense.
But even the bamboo sleeping mat
rolled in the corner,
even the place of prayer, is clean.
And a small man
sits legs askew in the shadow
the farthest wall casts
halfway across the room.
He is bent over, his head
rests on the floor and he is speaking something
as though to us and not to us.
The CO wants to ignore him;
he locks and loads and fires a clip into the walls
which are not packed with rice this time
and tells us to move out.
But one of us moves toward the man,
curious about what he is saying.
We bend him to sit straight
and when he’s nearly peaked
at the top of his slow uncurling,
his face becomes visible, his eyes
roll down to the charge
wired between his teeth and floor.
The sparrows
burst off the walls into the jungle.
Beyond that vital aspect, most speakers in my poems are what someone once characterized as haggards of urban or pastoral loneliness — bluesy, isolated and marginalized figures who deal with a wide range of losses; unmoored souls, negotiating flawed lives in a flawed world.
DPR: What is it about travel and differing environs that turns your thoughts to poetry? Where do you feel most at home?
JA:
Travel puts me in the heartlands of my poetic obsessions. My muse is a
forerunner whereby I often begin writing poems of a certain place long
before I travel there. I research places on Google street maps and
virtually walk them before being there physically. I am at heart a poet
of Place and I must travel. I’ve written poems about fictional incidents
in towns I’ve only visited in cyberspace. For instance, a large body of
my early work is Southwest regionalism, and I once transferred notes
written on a napkin in a real bar in Florida to a mythical one in San
Ysidro, California. I simply liked the name San Ysidro; for all I knew,
there were no bars there – I just have a love for Latinate names, and I
needed grist for a poem I wanted to situate in a western border town,
grist provided by a real bar in Florida. I’ve also written poems based
on articles in farm magazines about growing cotton and peanuts. Online
sources can aid immensely in your writing, whether researching
wildflowers in a country on the other side of the earth, or learning
what you need to about specialized tools you suspect are used in a
machine shop somewhere in the town you live. In addition to books of
poems set in different places in the US, I have three chapbooks whose
poems are set in overseas countries: Ireland, Scotland, and Italy. It’s
important to state that these poems are set in those countries, they are
not about them, per se. I’m only a guest in a region or place. So what
often results then, is an invented presence that reflects a widely
traveled imagination where my mind determines as the emotional resonance
of a place – what reverberates in image, or emotion, with my readers,
even if it’s a troubled relationship with the world. I’ll offer one of
my 2008 poems as an example of what I mean:
Leaving Provence on a Sunday
The lazing wastrel on Rue Caristie
always takes his place by the fishmonger.
A nurse leans down, puts her hand on his face.
As if shame were redeemed, she rose to leave.
Though he did not rise, his lips brushed her palms.
On the steps of the Palace of Popes
a woman leans to kiss her lover’s neck.
But he seems puzzled, like a scolded child,
fathoms what it means to fall in love, her
voice so arctic she must have fallen first.
DPR: You have received awards and wide recognition for your excellent writing. How do you approach writing poetry? Is it generally mood-driven, image-driven, emotion-driven, place-driven, or event-driven?
JA: Thank you on the awards. My poems are more Place and mood-driven than by the other aspects. I think of my poems as soulfully plaintive — to pull the reader in through gravitas or pathos — a distillation of emotions and messy characters, their quiet dispossession, even something of the numinous — what remains mysterious or unknown in emotions and aesthetics. The natural and elemental things of the human condition are also vital to me. Like it says in the Intro to Djuna Barnes’ ‘Nightwood’, “There is a truth to these damaged hearts that moves us beyond the negative.”
DPR: Drawing on your prolific creative output and your co-editorship of San Pedro River Review, what pearls of wisdom might you share with novice poets?
JA: So much to say, but I’ll try to be concise. First, never fall prey to the thought of some that ‘you can only write what you know’ – that is, from the real circumstances of your own personal life or experiences; that’s simply nonsense – no one can restrict the fecundity of your imagination. In clear-cut expression, you can make it all up! It’s akin to the line from Henry Miller’s Tropic of Cancer: “The images are real, even if the whole story is false.” A poem is not sworn testimony, an affidavit, a deposition, a software licensing agreement. As Philip Levine once remarked to Larry Levis, “In a poem you don’t owe anybody a thing.” Fictive elements in your poem are no different than those found in fiction novels. You want to write a poem about a plumber, or firefighter, sailor or accountant? Read online job descriptions, type them up, then turn them into poems using the imaginative creative processes we’ve addressed here. Or again, Richard Hugo said in The Real West Marginal Way, “I saw people who never were, in a place I had never been.” This is akin to what Louisiana Poet Laureate Jack Bedell called an “an originality of utterance” in poetry.
Beyond that, young writers should never be self-referential or employ inward-looking observances that don’t engage the world at large. Universal truths reside in even the most personal of experience, and certainly don’t need to be large philosophical declarations. Attention to a particular place and a particular moment can still evoke in readers a shared experience. Through exploring with informative detail a regional perspective, a writer can still strike a responsive chord with readers and listeners, regardless of place and time.
DPR: What are your favorite things to write about?
JA:
Beyond what I’ve mentioned already, most speakers in my poems are what
someone once characterized as haggards of urban or pastoral loneliness —
bluesy, isolated, and marginalized figures who deal with a wide range of
losses; unmoored souls, negotiating flawed lives in a flawed world. For
me, such lives are situated most often in deserts, rural areas of the
South, small towns, and seacoasts. Beyond that, and overall, there is a
wild magic in the process of constructing our poems. If you are a
regional, or poet of Place like myself, you will find that researching
the grist for your poem often becomes a lesson in geography, earth
science, culture, sociology, religion, and so forth. In the process,
certain physical elements begin to serve as objective correlatives – the
spirit, or symbol of things: sometimes rain nourishes famished crops; at
other times it accelerates hypothermia for a homeless man. Now keep in
mind that when I say “landscape” I mean it more in terms of psychic
landscape, something inextricably tied to image.
DPR: Who influences/inspires your approach to poetry writing? Do you often find yourself writing in the same voice or style?
JA:
In my early years of writing poetry, my influences were Yusef Komunyakaa,
Kevin Young, Richard Hugo, Jane Kenyon, Philip Levine, and Walt McDonald
— but not in that order. I went back and forth between those writers,
and still do. In later years I was influenced by darker works such as
those of German poet Ingeborg Bachman, Austrian Georg Trakl, the early
works of CD Wright and Frank Stanford, and the starker poems of Charles
Simic and Adam Zagajewski. There are others, of course, but those poets
are the most exemplary. Sometimes I write in their voices or styles,
most often my writing is but a refraction of such authors. |
||||
Book Review by Larry D. Thomas |
||||
Alfier,
Jeffrey. The Shadow Field. Louisiana Literature Press, Hammond,
Louisiana. 2020. Pp 60. ISBN: 978-0-945083-50-4. $14.95 Jeffrey C. Alfier, the founder and co-editor of Blue Horse Press and San Pedro River Review, has published numerous collections of poetry with intriguingly various settings from the American Southwest to Ireland; from Italy to Scotland; from California to the author’s home of New Jersey; and from other locales to the American South. In The Shadow Field, Alfier transports the reader to the timeless rhythms of ancient European places: to their fields, laborers, bodegas, inns, wildlife, vineyards, olive trees, and ever-changing light. Although Alfier is without question an accomplished poet of “place,” his “places” are never merely provincial but more importantly serve as vehicles through which universal human concerns may be made manifest. The reviewer should note that Alfier is also a highly accomplished photographer whose photographs have been widely published.
In these poems of consummate poetic artistry and precision, the poet’s
portrayal of natural light is particularly memorable. He writes of sun
“emergent like a spectral / ship from the buried memory of Greece”; “the
stutter of failing sunlight”; “sun’s / bronze sliver tracing autumn
fields”; “The moon / finally arriving—the usual voyeur, / sieving
through what windows / it can”; and “where a small strip of sun comes
through, / a bright red scarf.”
Alfier’s deft poetic skill is equally apparent in his depiction of
shadow and darkness. To a farmer in a bodega, “Memories / flash, like
light, like shadows, like ravens / in his fields.” Alfier witnesses “the
dark that enfolds / the plaza”; “dust gauzing the bluing sunset”; “Deer
heaping / shadows over plowed ground farmers surrendered to”; and “The
moon leering behind alder trees. Nightbirds / I’ve never seen cling to
dark branches.”
As only the best artists are able to do, Alfier finds beauty in the
shadows; artists who know that one’s appreciation of light is directly
proportionate to his/her ability to plumb the deepest depths of
darkness; artists who understand that nothing can redeem humanity from
this tragic vision but boundless love, faith, and the mystical power of
great art.
The seamlessly arranged poems of
The Shadow
Field are dazzlingly rich not only
with place-specific description but also with soul-deep forays into the
mysteries of the human heart.
No
contemporary poet this reviewer is aware of renders Thoreau’s “quiet
desperation” all humans live in as completely, convincingly, precisely,
and unforgettably as Alfier has succeeded in doing in these remarkable
poems. He not only wanders through the European locales which define the
very essence of our humanity but, more importantly, transcribes that
essence into language so vivid and sonically rich that it is nothing
less than stunning. Larry D. Thomas
Member, Texas Institute of Letters
|
||||
|
||||
|